Dynamics of Students’ Attitudes Towards the Death Penalty in a Group Discussion

Abstract

Abstract

Background. In Russian psychology, there is a shortage of experimental research on the attitudes toward the death penalty (DP) as a source of opinion polarization, as well as its dynamics in the context of a group discussion. Studying the dynamics of these attitudes during group discussions allows to identify patterns of opinion polarization and the influence of social interaction mechanisms on the polarization process. Understanding this phenomenon is important for modern psychology in the context of increasing polarization in society.

Objective. To study the dynamics of attitudes towards DP among students in a group discussion.

Study Participants. The total sample consisted of 88 people aged 18 to 22 years. Sample 1 (2024) — students, N = 56 (41% boys), 55% studying, 45% combining work and study. Sample 2 (2025) — students, N = 32 (25% boys), 51% studying, 49% combining work and study.

Methods. An online survey; the experiment implementing a group discussion were conducted twice with different samples: in 2024 and in 2025 (one year after the terrorist attack at a Moscow shopping and entertainment center). Attitudes toward DP were measured on a 10-point Likert scale. Changes in attitudes toward DP from the first to the second measurement (before and after the group discussion) were compared in the control and experimental groups. Data processing included descriptive statistics and a significance analysis of differences; comparisons of indicators were conducted using the Wilcoxon criterion.

Results. In Experiment 1, differences between the two measures of attitudes toward DP were significant in the "DP supporters" and "Doubters" subgroups. In Experiment 2, significant differences were found between the two measures only in the experimental group — discussion participants; no differences were found in the control group.

Conclusions. Public presentation of opinions and discussion regarding abolition of the moratorium on the death penalty in Russia among student participants in the experiment are essential conditions for the dynamics of attitudes toward DP, leading to a shift in opinions toward lower approval of DP among representatives of both the "inert" and "polarized" subgroups. The study design and results obtained have practical implications for the development of experimental approaches to studying public opinion polarization processes.

`

References

Benjamin, A.J.Jr. (2006). The relationship between right-wing authoritarianism and attitudes toward violence: Further validation of the Attitudes Toward Violence Scale. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 34(8), 923–926. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2006.34.8.923

Bliuc, A.-M., Betts, J.M., Faulkner, N., Vergani, M., Chow, R.J., Iqbal, M., Best, D. (2020). The effects of local sociopolitical events on group cohesion in online farright communities. PLoS ONE, 15(3), e0230302. URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230302 (accessed: 15.04.2020).

Chirun, S.N. (2010). Political activity and political participation of youth: problems and opportunities. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal, (332), 50–54. (In Russ.)

Colémont, A., Hiel, A.V., Cornelis, I. (2011). Five-Factor Model personality dimensions and right-wing attitudes: Psychological bases of punitive attitudes? Personality and Individual Differences, 50(4), 486–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.032

Donohue, J., Wolfers, J.J. (2006). The death penalty: No evidence for deterrence. The Economists' Voice, 3(5), 1553–3832. https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1170

Druckman, J.N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., Ryan, J.B. (2021). Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America. Nature Human Behaviour, (5), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01012-5

Dudar', A.I., Husjainov, T.M. (2016). Attitudes toward the death penalty among modern youth (according to a pilot sociological study). Nauka. Mysl': elektronnyj periodicheskij zhurnal = A Science. Thought: Electronic Periodic Journal, (6-2), 113–118. (In Russ.)

Durham, A.M., Elrod, H.P., Kinkade, P.T. (1996). Public support for the death penalty: Beyond Gallup. Justice Quarterly, 13(4), 705–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829600093161

Enikolopov, S.N., Mkrtchyan, A.A. (2011). Psychological consequences of terrorism and the role of mass media in the process of their formation. National Psychological Journal, (1), 19–23. (In Russ.)

Fabiani, M. (2024). Wealth polarization in western countries. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, (71), 557–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2024.09.004.

Fang, X., Heuser, S., Stötzer, L.S. (2025). How in-person conversations shape political polarization: Quasi-experimental evidence from a nationwide initiative. Journal of Public Economics, 242, 105309. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272725000076?via%3Dihub (accessed: 15.04.2025).

Filippova, E.V., Fomina, T.G., Morosanova, V.I. (2015). The program of development a conscious self-regulation as a means of improving the reliability of learning activities of students in the exam situation: experimental verification of its effectiveness. Lomonosov Psychology Journal, (4), 55–65. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/vsp.2015.04.55

Gagarina, M.A., Solovova, N.A., Nevryuev. A.N. (2024). Russians' attitude towards the death penalty: the role of personal and socio-psychological characteristic. Psihologiya i Pravo = Psychology and Law, 14(3), 13–25. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140302

Gordyakova, O.V. (2023). The dynamics of the polarization of opinions in the conditions of a special military operation. Uchenye Zapiski Instituta Psihologii RAN = Proceedings of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 3(1), 18–32. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38098/proceedigs_2023_03_01_03

Iakshina, A.N., Smirnova, V.N. (2024). Indirect play support: the influence of storytelling on pretend play development in preschool age. Sovremennoe doshkol'noe obrazovanie = Preschool Education Today, 18(2), 33–47. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/12782-4519-2024-2122-33-47

Iyengar, S., Sood, G., Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038

Jaspal, R., Silva Lopes, B.C.D., Breakwell, G.M. (2021). British national identity and life satisfaction in ethnic minorities in the United Kingdom. National Identities, 23(5), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2020.1822793

Kandola, S.S., Egan, V. (2014). Individual differences underlying attitudes to the death penalty. Personality and Individual Differences, (66), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.005

Kesenheimer, J.S., Greitemeyer, T. (2022). Going green is exhausting for dark personalities but beneficial for the light ones: An experience sampling study that examines the subjectivity of pro-environmental behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, (13), 883704. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883704/full (accessed: 14.04.2022).

Khashaeva, S.V., Kovalchuk, O.V., Dagaev, R.R. (2021). Political activity of regional youth. NOMOTHETIKA: Filosofiya. Sociologiya = NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 46(4), 668–678. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2021-46-4-668-678

Kruglanski, A.W., Molinario, E., Jasko, K., Webber, D., Leander, N.P., Pierro. A. (2022). Significance-Quest Theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(4), 1050–1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211034825

Lebedev, A.N. (2022). On the theory of value-affective polarization of social groups. Uchenye Zapiski Instituta Psihologii RAN = Proceedings of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2(1), 2–19. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38098/proceedings_2022_02_01_01

Lebedev, A.N. (2023). The phenomenon of affect of uncertainty and value-affective polarization of large social groups. Uchenye Zapiski Instituta Psihologii RAN = Proceedings of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 3(1), 3–17. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38098/proceedigs_2023_03_01_02

Lebedev, A.N. (2024). The affect of polarization uncertainty and was S. Moscovici right? Uchenye Zapiski Instituta Psihologii RAN = Proceedings of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 4(2), 27–39. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38098/proceedings_2024_04_02_04

Lebedev, A.N. (2025). Method of provocative group discussion to study the value-affective polarization of a social group. Eksperimental'naya psihologiya = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 18(1), 169–180. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2025180111

Lebedev, A.N., Gordyakova, O.V. (2021). The phenomenon of group polarization in political science and political psychology of the USA and Europe. Institut Psihologii Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk. Social'naya i ekonomicheskaya psihologiya = Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology, 6(4), 123–150. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.sep_2021_24_4_06

Lebedev, A.N., Gordyakova, O.V. (2023). Value-affective polarization of large social groups in conditions of information uncertainty. Social'naya Psihologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 14(4), 38–54. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2023140403

Lebedev, A.N., Gordyakova, O.V., Panfilova, A.S. (2023). The phenomenon of value-affective polarization of large social groups and a method for assessing implicit political attitudes. Eksperimental'naya psihologiya = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 16(4), 88–103. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2023160406

Liu, Z. (2022). The internet echo chamber and the misinformation of judges: The case of judges' perception of public support for the death penalty in China. International Review of Law and Economics, (69), 106028. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0144818821000521?via%3Dihub (accessed: 15.04.2022).

Maggard, S.R., Payne, B.K., Chappell, A.T. (2012). Attitudes toward capital punishment: Educational, demographic, and neighborhood crime influences. The Social Science Journal, 49(2), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2011.08.016

March, E., Marrington, J.Z. (2023). Antisocial and prosocial online behaviour: Exploring the roles of the Dark and Light Triads. Current Psychology, 42(3), 1390–1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01552-7

McCarthy, D., Brunton-Smith, I. (2024). Attitudes towards the death penalty: An assessment of individual and country-level differences. European Journal of Criminology, 21(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708221097670

Melnikova, O.T., Nesterova, E.M. (2024). Features of group discussion in in-person and online focus groups. Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 47(1), 184–206. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/LPJ-24-08

Mityaeva, Yu.V. (2019). Some aspects of political participation of Russian youth. Vybory: teoriya i praktika = Elections: Theory and Practice, (2), 10–18. (In Russ.)

O'Neil, K.M., Patry, M.W., Penrod, S.D. (2004). Exploring the effects of attitudes toward the death penalty on capital sentencing verdicts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 10(4), 443–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.10.4.443

Olonisakin, T.T. (2023). Need for closure and ethnic identification: The varied roles of cultural intelligence in a multiethnic group society. Journal of Community Psychology, 51(5), 2035–2051. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22993

Rothers, A. (2025). The poles in polarization: Social categorization and affective polarization in multiparty systems. Electoral Studies, (95), 102908. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379425000149?via%3Dihub (accessed: 15.04.2025).

Ruel, M.K., De'Jesús, A.R., Cristo, M., Nolan, K., Stewart-Hill, S.A., DeBonis, A.M., Goldstein, A., Frederick, M., Geher, G., Alijaj, N., Elyukin, N., Huppert, S., Kruchowy, D., Maurer, E., Santos, A., Spackman, B.C., Villegas, A., Widrick, K., Wojszynski, C., Zezula, V. (2022). Why should I help you? A study of betrayal and helping. Current Psychology, 42(21), 17825–17834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02954-x

Semenov, V.E. (2015). Socio-cultural polarization and social consent in the context of conception of the Russian polymentality. Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kul'tury = Proceedings of the St. Petersburg State Institute of Culture, (206), 92–100. (In Russ.)

Shiina, A., Niitsu T., Tomoto, A., Igarashi, Y., Shimizu, E., Iyo, M. (2024). An international comparison study between public opinion in the UK and Japan regarding capital punishment and the use of an insanity defense. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, (32), 100966. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235255252400001X?via%3Dihub (accessed: 15.04.2024).

Turner, J.C., Wetherell, M., Hogg, M.A. (1989). Referent informational influence and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1989.tb00855.x

van Erkel, P.F.A., Van Aelst, P. (2024). Social media and affective polarization: does Facebook news use fuel political in- and out-group affect in a multi-party context? Acta Politica, 60(2), 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-023-00324-4

Vanin, A.V., Gordyakova, O.V. (2023). Review of publications on the topic: "Value-affective polarization of social groups". Uchenye Zapiski Instituta Psihologii RAN = Proceedings of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 3(3), 74–80. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38098/proceedings_2023_03_03_07

Wagner, M. (2021). Affective polarization in multiparty systems. Electoral Studies, 69(2), 102199. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0261379420300822?via%3Dihub (accessed: 15.04.2021).

Wallace, W.C. (2024). Police recruits' attitudes toward the death penalty in Trinidad and Tobago. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, (76), 100644. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1756061623000708?via%3Dihub (accessed: 15.04.2024).

Zandian, P., Habibi, M., Seydi, Z., Kleman, B., Tayeri, N., Fashandi, N., Shariat, S.V. (2017). How gender, majors, religion and mental health affect the justified death attitude? Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 11(4), e7700. URL: https://brieflands.com/articles/ijpbs-7700 (accessed: 17.02.2017).