Theoretical and Experimental Psychology
ISSN 2073-0861
eISSN 2782-5396
En Ru
ISSN 2073-0861
eISSN 2782-5396
RPS article spotlight
Articles

The Critical Thinking Components of Psychology Major Students

Abstract

Abstract

Background. The study of critical thinking is driven by the need to develop a vital competence — critical evaluation of information in the context of digitalization, while theoretical ambiguity in its conceptualization persists.

Objectives. Theoretical and empirical identification of an "orientation towards doubt" as a stable critical thinking disposition, and the development of a model linking critical thinking with intrinsic motivation.

Study Participants. The study involved 78 respondents aged 17 to 50 years (Mage = 23.01; SD = 9.12; 72 women), students in psychology.

Methods. The research had a correlational design. Syllogistic reasoning tasks were used to assess critical thinking skill. The study implemented the following methods: to assess critical thinking dispositions — scales of Cognitive Flexibility Questionnaire, Need for Cognition Scale, and Wason four-card selection modification tasks; to assess different aspects of motivation — the Academic Motivation Scale and a modified version of involuntary text memorization tasks (psychology-themed). Correlation analysis and structural modeling were used to process quantitative data.

Results. The study developed general and specific path models linking critical thinking and intrinsic motivation, both demonstrating good fit with empirical data. The analysis presented correlations between variables and summary tables of regression coefficients. Results show that orientation towards doubt has a statistically significant effect on critical thinking skills, while critical thinking dispositions show no predictive relationship with skills performance. Content-related intrinsic motivation at the dispositional level can act as a mediator for orientation towards doubt. Formal-dynamic intrinsic motivation significantly influences critical thinking dispositions.

Conclusions. The study enabled the identification of a key critical thinking disposition — orientation towards doubt, which is a better predictor of its effectiveness compared to other dispositions. The developed model specifies the relationship between critical thinking and intrinsic motivation, demonstrating that the content-related intrinsic motivation (related to subject-specific characteristics) can be a better predictor than the formal-dynamic aspect (associated with enjoyment of the activity).

References

Ariely, D. (2023). Positive irrationality: How to benefit from your illogical actions. Moscow: Alpina Publ. (In Russ.)

Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B. (2002). Psychology of creative abilities: Textbook for higher education students. Moscow: Akademiya Publ. (In Russ.)

Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Was natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31(3), 187–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(89)90023-1

Davydov, V.V. (1972). Types of Generalization in Learning: Logical and Psychological Problems in the Construction of Academic Subjects. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ. (In Russ.)

Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Chicago: Heath & Co Publ.

Dusavitsky, A.K. (2012). The Development of Personality in Student Groups Depending on the Formation of Educational and Professional Interests. Kharkov: Karazin Kharkiv National University Publ. (In Russ.)

Facione, N.C., Facione, P.A. (1997). Critical thinking assessment in nursing education programs: An aggregate data analysis. California: Academic Press.

Facione, P.A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction—The Delphi report. California: Academic Press.

Gerlich, M. (2025). AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking. Societies, 15(6). URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/1/6 (accessed: 03.01.2025).

Gordeeva, T.O., Sychev, O.A., Osin, E.N. (2014). "Academic motivation scales" questionnaire. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal IP RAS, 35(4), 96–107. (In Russ.)

Halpern, D.F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.4.449

Karakuş, İ. (2024). University students' cognitive flexibility and critical thinking dispositions. Front. Psychol, (15), 1420272. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1420272/full (accessed: 09.09.2024).

Khil, Y., Sadova, A., Soboleva, O., Stepashkina, E., Guzhelya, D. (2024). Critical Thinking Dispositions: Development and Validation of an Assessment Tool. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow, (2), 350–374. https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2024-16770 (In Russ.)

Koreshnikova, Y., Avdeeva, E. (2022). Interest Cannot Be Forced. The Role of Academic Motivation and Teaching Styles in the Development of Students' Critical Thinking. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow, (3), 36–66. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-3-36-66

Kurginyan, S., Osavolyuk, E. (2018). Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI): Adaptation for Russian-speaking sample. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal IP RAS, (39), 105–119. (In Russ.)

Lai, E.R. (2011). Critical thinking: A literature review research report. Tabor: Parsons Publ.

Leontiev, A., Rozenblyum, A. (1999). Psikhologicheskoe issledovanie deyatelnosti i interesov posetiteley TsPKiO im. Gorkogo. In: A.E. Voiskunsky, A.N. Zhdan, O.K. Tikhomirova, (eds.). Traditions and Prospects of the Activity-Based Approach in Psychology: A.N. Leontiev's School. (pp. 370–425). Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russ.)

Leontiev, D.A., Klein, K.G. (2018). The quality of motivation and the quality of experiences as characteristics of learning activity. Lomonosov Psychology Journal, (4), 106–119. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/vsp.2018.04.106

Lomov, B. (1985). Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

Markovits, H., Nantel, G. (1989). The belief-bias effect in the production and evaluation of logical conclusions. Memory & Cognition, (17), 11–17.

Pedhazur, E.J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (2nd ed.). New York City: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Publ.

Repkin, V., Repkina, N. (1997). Developmental education: Theory and practice. Tomsk: Peleng Publ. (In Russ.)

Romashchuk, A., Lukianova, V. (2024). The Effect of Coherence Level and Assumption Form on the Wason Selection Task Solution. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki = Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 21(2), 366–386. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2024-2-366-386

Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, (61). URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0361476X20300254?via%3Dihub (accessed: 08.04.2020).

Sorina, G.V., Gurov, F.N. The metaverse and the problems of modern education. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 20. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie = Lomonosov Pedagogical Education Journal, (3), 9–23. (In Russ.)

Shepeleva, E., Valueva, E., Lapteva, E. (2018). Need for Cognition: the comparative analysis of different researches and psycho-diagnostic approaches. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 7(3), 115–125. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2018070311

Sosu, E.M. (2012). The development and psychometric validation of a Critical Thinking Disposition Scale. Thinking Skills and Creativity, (2012), 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.09.002

Stanovich, K. (2016). What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought. Moscow: Career Press. (In Russ.)

Sternberg, R.J., Halpern, D.F. (Eds.) (2020). Critical thinking in psychology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tarasova, K.V., Orel, E.A. (2022). Measuring Students' Critical Thinking in Online Environment: Methodology, Conceptual Framework and Tasks Typology. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies (Moscow), (3), 187–212. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-3-187-212

Valenzuela, J., Nieto, A., Ossa, C., Sepúlveda, S., Muñoz, C. (2023). Relationships between motivational factors and critical thinking. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 16(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.32457/ejep.v16i1.2077

Wang, S. (2017). An exploration into research on critical thinking and its cultivation: An overview. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(12), 1266–1280. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0712.14

Wason, P.C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (20), 273–281.

West, R.F., Toplak, M.E., Stanovich, K.E. (2008). Heuristics and biases as measures of critical thinking: Associations with cognitive ability and thinking dispositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 930–941. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012842

Zhang, Q., Tang, H., Xu, X. (2022). Analyzing collegiate critical thinking course effectiveness: Evidence from a quasi-experimental study in China. Thinking Skills and Creativity, (45). URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1871187122001080?via%3Dihub (accessed: 14.02.2022).

PDF, ru

Received: 05/29/2025

Revised: 09/16/2025

Accepted: 10/30/2025

Keywords: critical thinking; critical thinking disposition; cognitive flexibility; need for cognition; selection task; intrinsic motivation; academic motivation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11621/TEP-25-32

Available in the on-line version with: 22.12.2025

  • To cite this article:
Issue 4, 2025