Theoretical and Experimental Psychology
ISSN 2073-0861
eISSN 2782-5396
En Ru
ISSN 2073-0861
eISSN 2782-5396
RPS article spotlight
Articles

Questionnaire for Somatic Assessment of Stress Symptoms: Primary Psychometric Validation (Stage II)

Abstract

Abstract

Background. Development and validation of tools for identifying stress-associated somatic manifestations are of great importance for clinical and psychological practice. Currently, there is a deficit of validated questionnaires for detecting stress-related somatization that provide comprehensive coverage of physiological systems. The development of a new questionnaire will create opportunities for studying the structure and mechanisms of somatic stress reactions, including the assessment of rarely analyzed but significant symptoms of stress experience, such as bruxism and masticatory muscle parafunctions. At the first stage, the development and theoretical justification of the new questionnaire were carried out. The present study represents the second stage of primary validation, including the assessment of psychometric properties prior to large-scale testing.

Objective. To conduct an initial psychometric validation of a new questionnaire for assessing somatic manifestations of stress in adults, including symptoms of bruxism and related masticatory muscle parafunctions.

Study Participants. Validation was conducted on 501 adult respondents (331 women and 170 men, aged 18–65, median age 42). Additional 50 participants (aged 22–70, median age 36) were involved in testing the questionnaire formulations.

Methods. A socio-demographic questionnaire, the Somatic Assessment of Stress Symptoms (55 items), and the following psychometric scales were used: PSM-25, Hamilton Anxiety Scale, Zung Depression Scale, Freiburg Personality Inventory, the Brief Resilience Scale, and PHQ-15. The correlation between the questionnaire and the external scales was assessed using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. The factorial structure of the questionnaire was evaluated by confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald’s omega coefficients (ωh, ωt), and G6 (Guttman’s Lambda 6).

Results. The questionnaire demonstrated high reliability, validity, and significant test-retest stability.

Conclusions. The developed questionnaire exhibits satisfactory psychometric properties and is, in fact, the first tool capable of comprehensively identifying stress-associated somatic manifestations in adults. It covers a wide range of physiological systems and includes specific manifestations such as bruxism and masticatory muscle parafunctions, which have not previously been integrated into similar instruments. Accordingly, this tool can be recommended for subsequent studies, allowing further clarification of its validity, representativeness, and practical value in clinical and psychological practice.

References

Balashova, T.I. (1992). The Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). In: Methods of psychodiagnostics in addictology. (pp. 35–38). Saint Petersburg: V.M. Bekhterev Research Institute Publ. (In Russ.)

Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

Dubinskaya, A.D., Yurova, O.V. (2025). Data Base (501): Somatic Overview of Stress Symptoms (SOSS). Mendeley Data, V1. URL: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/c9tpzsxf89/1 (accessed: 22.10.2025).

Dubinskaya, A.D., Yurova, O.V. (2025b). Assessment of somatic manifestations of stress: Methodological limitations of standardized questionnaires and ways of developing a new tool. National Psychological Journal, preprint. (In Russ.). URL: https://preprints.ru/article/1930 (accessed: 22.10.2025).

Dubinskaya, A.D., Yurova, O.V. (2025а). Database based on the results of the SOSS questionnaire and psychometric tests (n = 500). Mendeley Data, V1. (In Russ.). URL: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/fxcpws38km/1 (accessed: 22.10.2025).

Ghasemi, F., Beversdorf, D.Q., Herman, K.C. (2024). Stress and stress responses: A narrative literature review from physiological mechanisms to intervention approaches. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, (18). URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/18344909241289222 (accessed: 22.10.2025).

Gierk, B., Kohlmann, S., Kroenke, K., Spangenberg, L., Zenger, M., Brähler, E., Löwe, B. (2014). The Somatic Symptom Scale–8 (SSS-8): A brief measure of somatic symptom burden. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(3), 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12179

James, K.A., Stromin, J.I., Steenkamp, N., Combrinck, M.I. (2023). Understanding the relationships between physiological and psychosocial stress, cortisol and cognition. Frontiers in Endocrinology, (14), 1085950. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1085950

Hamilton, M. (2002). The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale: modern methods for assessing mental state. Methodological materials. Moscow: Mental Health Research Center Publ. (In Russ.)

Huang, F., Zhang, M., Chen, Y.-J., Li, Q., Wu, A.-Z. (2011). Psychological stress induces temporary masticatory muscle sensitivity in rats. BioMed Research International, 2011(1), 720603. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2011/720603 (accessed: 22.10.2025).

James, K.A. Stromin, J.I., Steenkamp, N., Combrinck, M.I. (2023). Understanding the relationships between physiological and psychosocial stress, cortisol and cognition. Frontiers in Endocrinology, (14), 1085950. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1085950

Koo, T.K., Li, M.Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R.L., Williams, J.B. (2002). The PHQ-15: Validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64(2), 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200203000-00008

Krylov, A.A., Ronginskaya, T.I. (2000). Freiburg Personality Inventory (FPI): modified form B. In: A.A. Krylov, S.A. Manichev, (eds.). Workshop on general, experimental and applied psychology. (pp. 314–324). Saint Petersburg: Piter Publ. (In Russ.)

Lemyre, L., Tessier, R., Fillion, L. (1990). Psychological Stress measurement (MSP): User manual. Montreal: Éditions Behaviora Publ.

Markova, V.I., Aleksandrova, L.A., Zolotareva, A.A. (2022). The Russian version of the Brief Resilience Scale: the psychometric analysis on the example of samples of students, parents with many children, and parents of disabled children. National Psychological Journal, (1), 65–75. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2022.0106

McGhee, L.L., Jaworski, S. (2023). Systemic stress responses: mechanisms, biomarkers, and clinical implications. Frontiers in Physiology, (14), 112345. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.112345

Mokkink, L.B., Terwee, C.B., Patrick, D.L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P.W., Knol, D.L., Bouter, L.M., de Vet, H.C.W. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8

Oosterwijk, P.R., van der Ark, L.A., Sijtsma, K. (2016). Numerical differences between Guttman’s reliability coefficients and the GLB. In the Quantitative Psychology Research. In: L.A. van der Ark, D.M. Bolt, W.-C. Wang, J.A. Douglas, M. Wiberg, (eds.). 80th Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society (July 12–16, 2015). (pp. 155–172). Cham: Springer Publ.

Orçan, F. (2023). Comparison of Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega for ordinal data: Are they different? International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 10(4), 709–722. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1271693

Pavlou, I.A., Spandidos, D.A., Zoumpourlis, V., Papakosta, V.K. (2024). Neurobiology of bruxism: The impact of stress (Review). Biomedical Reports, 20(4), 59. URL: https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/br.2024.1747 (accessed: 22.10.2025).

Piao, X., Xie, J., Managi, S. (2024). Continuous worsening of population emotional stress globally: universality and variations. BMC Public Health, (24), 3576. URL: https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-024-20961-4 (accessed: 22.10.2025).

Vodopyanova, N.E. (2009). Psychodiagnostics of stress. Saint Petersburg: Piter Publ. (In Russ.)

Von Elm, E., Altman, D.G., Egger, M., Pocock, S.J., Gøtzsche, P.C., Vandenbroucke, J.P., STROBE Initiative (2014). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. International Journal of Surgery, 12(12), 1495–1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013

Zhang, Z. (2016). Cronbach’s α vs McDonald’s ω. Behavioral Research Methods, 48(2), 651–674. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0634-5

Zolotareva, A.A. (2022). Measurement of somatic symptoms in the general population: standardization of the Russian PHQ-15. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 18(4), 38–46. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2022180404

Zung, W.W.K. (1965). A self-rating depression scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 12(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1965.01720310065008

PDF, ru

Received: 09/08/2025

Revised: 10/28/2025

Accepted: 11/08/2025

Keywords: stress; somatic manifestations; questionnaire; validation; stress diagnostics; bruxism; somatization

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11621/TEP-25-37

Available in the on-line version with: 22.12.2025

  • To cite this article:
Issue 4, 2025