Development and Testing of a Portable Biofeedback System Based on GSR for Managing Psycho-Emotional State

Abstract

Abstract

Background. In the context of a fast-paced lifestyle and high stress levels, assessing and managing psycho-emotional states has become an important task. Traditional methods, such as questionnaires, have limited accuracy due to the subjectivity of data, whereas physiological approaches, including the measurement of galvanic skin response (GSR), provide an objective assessment. However, existing devices for GSR recording are bulky and expensive, which limits their application. This article explores the possibility of using a portable biofeedback system (BFS) based on GSR.

Objective. Development and testing of a portable biofeedback system (BFS) based on GSR, which combines sufficient measurement accuracy, ease of use, and the ability to integrate into daily life.

Study Participants. A total of 43 individuals participated in the study.

Methods. Comparative and correlational analyses were performed on data obtained from a portable GSR sensor and a laboratory EEG (NVX36). Data acquisition took place during a psycho-emotional task. A study was conducted to determine the optimal sensor placement using descriptive and comparative methods. Regression analysis was performed to configure the mobile application algorithm. A visualization was developed within the application to assess the user's psycho-emotional state. Data visualization and graph analysis were employed at all stages.

Results. The developed sensor demonstrated results comparable to laboratory equipment, despite a slight delay in response. The fingers were identified to be the optimal placement for the sensor, as the signal from them is clearer and more stable. The mobile application algorithm effectively aids in training emotional self-regulation.

Conclusions. The portable BOS system based on GSR demonstrates sufficient accuracy and convenience, making it promising for everyday use. The results of this work can be applied to further research in the field of portable devices aimed at self-regulation training.

References

Benedek, M., Kaernbach, C. (2010). A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 190(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.04.028

Boucsein, W. (1994). The use of electrical skin activity as an indicator of emotions. Inostrannaya psikhologiya = Foreign Psychology, 2(2), 57–66. (In Russ.)

Boucsein, W. (2012). Electrodermal activity (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer Science, Business Media Publ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1126-0

Critchley, H.D. (2002). Electrodermal responses: what happens in the brain. The Neuroscientist, 8(2), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/107385840200800209

Edelberg, R. (1972). Electrical activity of the skin: Its measurement and uses in psychophysiology. In: N.S. Greenfield, R.S. Sternbach, (eds.). Handbook of psychophysiology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Publ.

Setz, C., Arnrich, B., Schumm, J., La Marca, R., Tröster, G., Ehlert, U. (2010). Discriminating stress from cognitive load using a wearable EDA device. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 14(2), 410–417. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITB.2009.2036164.

Kotozaki, Y., Takeuchi, H., Sekiguchi, A., Yamamoto, Y., Shinada, T., Araki, T., Takahashi, K., Taki, Y., Ogino, T., Kiguchi, M., Kawashima, R. (2014). Biofeedback-based training for stress management in daily hassles: an intervention study. Brain and Behavior, 4(4), 566–579. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.241

Markiewicz, R., Markiewicz-Gospodarek, A., Dobrowolska, B. (2022). Galvanic skin response features in psychiatry and mental disorders: a narrative review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13428. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13428 (accessed: 01.02.2025).

Sukhodeev, V.V. (1990). Modified methodology for measurement and assessment of human galvanic skin responses. Moscow: IP RAS Publ. (In Russ.)

Toomin, M.K., Toomin, H. (1975). GSR biofeedback in psychotherapy: some clinical observations. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 12(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0086402

van Dooren, M., de Vries, J.J.G., Janssen, J.H. (2012). Emotional sweating across the body: comparing 16 different skin conductance measurement locations. Physiology and Behavior, 106(2), 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.01.020

Yarosh, O.B. (2024). Methodology for processing skin conductance response (scr) indicators in neuromarketing research. Uchenye zapiski krymskogo federal’nogo universiteta imeni V.I. Vernadskogo. Biologiya. Khimiya = Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Biology. Chemistry, 10(1), 262–275. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29039/2413-1725-2024-10-1-262-275

Yekhanin, S.G. (2011). Study of the galvanic skin response: Methodological instructions for a laboratory lesson in the discipline “Biomedical devices and sensors”. Tomsk: TUSUR Publ. (In Russ.). URL: https://studfile.net/preview/16874421/ (accessed: 01.02.2025).