From insight to creative amateur performance

Abstract

Background. The article describes the author’s way from researching the phenomenon of insight to revealing the psychological mechanism of creativity. Its first stage (1965) was a postgraduate continuation of the studies initiated in the term papers and dissertations under the guidance of S.L. Rubinshtein. At the second stage (1969) the author introduced a new experimental-diagnostic method “Creative field” into psychology. 

Objective. To reveal the author’s approach to the consideration of the thought process and the nature of creativity; to describe the study of the mechanism of creativity as an ability to develop activities on one’s own initiative. 

Results. At the first stage of research work it was justified that the mechanism of insight opened by Y.A. Ponomarev is not the only one. The studies demonstrated the role of the nature of the thinking languages and the dynamics of changing their types: from the visual image to the sign, and then — from the sign to the structure. The visibility of the structure explains instant emergence of the hypothesis. The author’s conclusions were confirmed in the theories of N.I. Zhinkin, L.M. Wecker, M. Hunt. The second stage of research allowed the author to realize the Rubinstein’s principle of creative activity and develop a typology of cognitive activity, which correlates with the cognition levels identified by G. Hegel: stimulus-productive level supposes implementation of the proposed task within the framework of initial requirements (according to Hegel — the level of the singular); heuristic level, carried out beyond the requirements of the original task, allows to discover new patterns (according to Hegel — the level of the special); creative level (according to Hegel — the level of the universal) is characteristic of the few. An open regularity does not act as a solution method, but as a starting point for constructing a theory. 

Conclusion. The article substantiates that the mechanism of creativity as the ability to develop one’s activity on his own initiative, can take place only with the dominance of cognitive motivation in the structure of personality. This has been confirmed in the sample of more than 10,000 subjects in a series of long-term studies in which one experiment is in process since 1970, when the subjects were 10th graders. The research data of these studies constitute a theoretical and empirical proof of the post-nonclassical methodological principle of the unity of truth and morality.

References

Adamar, Zh. (1970). Study of the psychological process of invention in the field of mathematics. Moscow: Sovetskoye radio. (In Russ.). 

Arnheim, R. (1994). New Essays on the Psychology of Art. Moscow: Prometej. (In Russ.). 

Bahtin, M.M. (1979). Aesthetics of verbal creativity. Moscow: Iskusstvo. (In Russ.). 

Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B. (1971). Method for studying the levels of intellectual activity. Voprosy psihologii (Questions of psychology), 1, 144–146. (In Russ.). 

Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B. (2021). Creativity mechanism: why we discover new things. Voprosy filosofii (Questions of philosophy), 9, 82–89. (In Russ.). 

Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B. (2010). Giftedness: the answer after a century and a half. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psihologiya (Moscow University Psychology Bulletin), 3, 3–17. (In Russ.). 

Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B., Bogoyavlenskaya, M.E. (2015). Giftedness: nature and diagnosis. Monograph. Moscow: Obrazovanie lichnosti. (In Russ.). 

Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B. (2015). The nature of creativity without mysticism. Philosophy of creativity. Moscow: IF RAN; Izd-vo “IINTELL”. (In Russ.). 

Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B. (2017). Standard about non-standard. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya (Problems of modern education), 1, 24–36. (In Russ.). 

Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B. (2019). Philosophical foundations of the theory of giftedness. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psihologiya (Cultural-historical psychology), 15, 2, 14–21. doi: 10.17759/ chp.2019150202 (In Russ.). 

Chelpanov, G.I. (1999). Psychology, philosophy, education. Selected works. Moscow: Moskovskij psihologo-social’nyj institute; Voronezh: NPO “MODEK”. (In Russ.). 

Einstein, A. (1967). Motives for scientific research. Speech on the occasion of the 60th birthday of Max Planck. Collection of scientific works (4th ed.). Articles, reviews, letters. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.). 

Galton, F. (1865). Hereditary Talent and Character. Macmillan’s Magazine, 12, 1865, 157–166. 

Gilford, J. (1965). Three sides of the intellect. Psychology of thinking. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.). 

Hegel, G.W.F. (1997). Science of logic. Saint-Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russ.). 

Heidegger, M. (2003). Being and time. Kharkiv: Folio. (In Russ.). 

Hunt, G. (2004). On the nature of consciousness. From a cognitive, phenomenological and transpersonal point of view. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo AST. (In Russ.). 

Menchinskaya, N.A. (1966). Thinking in the learning process. In E.V. Shorohova (Eds.), Studies of thinking in Soviet psychology. Moscow. (In Russ.). 

Pasternak, B. (1965). Poems & Poems. Moscow; Leningrad: Sovetskiy pisatel’. (In Russ.). 

Ponomarev, Y.A. (1976). Psychology of creativity. Moscow: Nauka. 

Rubinshtein, S.L. (1957). Being and consciousness. Moscow: AN SSSR. (In Russ.). 

Rubinshtein, S.L. (1958). About thinking and ways of its research. Moscow: “Nauka”, AN SSSR. (In Russ.). 

Rubinshtein, S.L. (1959). Principles and ways of development of psychology. Moscow: “Nauka”, AN SSSR. (In Russ.). 

Rubinshtein, S.L. (1946). Fundamentals of General Psychology. Moscow: Uchpedgiz. (In Russ.). 

Stepin, V.S. Self-developing systems and post-nonclassical rationality. Philosophy Library. (Retrieved from http://filosof.historic.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000249/). (In Russ.). 

Tejyar de Sharden, P. (1987). The phenomenon of human. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.). 

Teplov, B.M. (1985). Selected works (1st ed.). Moscow: Pedagogika. (In Russ.). 

Teplov, B.M. (1961). Problems of Individual Differences. Moscow: AN SSSR. (In Russ.). 

Vecker, L.M. (1998). Mind and reality. Moscow: Smysl. (In Russ.). 

Vygotskiy, L.S. (1982). Collected works: Problems of General Psychology (2nd ed.). Moscow: Pedagogika. (In Russ.). 

Yakimanskaya, I.S. (1980). Razvitie prostransnvennogo myshleniya shkol’nikov. Мoscow: Pedagogika.