Methodological analysis of the concept of “generation” in social psychology: classical, non-classical, and post-non-classical theories of generations

Abstract

<p><b>Background.</b> The study systematized methodological foundations of socio-psychological research of generations. Crucial issues are the pluralistic definition of the concept of “generation” in psychological science, the lack of methodological argumentation for the small samples in the qualitative research applied in the area, and the need to correlate different methodological positions in the process of cognition.</p>
<p><b>Objective.</b> To identify operationalization of the concept of “generation” in the classical, non-classical, and post-non-classical type of scientific rationality in order to define the methodological perspective (subject, methods) of the socio-psychological research.</p>
<p><b>Methods.</b> Deductive, analytical-synthetic.</p>
<p><b>Results.</b> To be applicable for the socio-psychological research, a “generation” can be defined as an object of non-classical science — a large group of peers socializing in the same historical context and acquiring similar psychological characteristics, and also as an object of post-non-classical science — a biography-narrative or symbolic system (symbols, discourse) formed in the contemporaries’ communicative field in a given period of time. The post-non-classical understanding of generation provides the arguments for obtaining valid results by qualitative methods (with in-depth data and non-mass, sufficient samples of relevant cases), which are aimed at restoring the meanings and senses reflected in the generation language and universal for its representatives. The definition of generation as a cohort, age stratum of society, or genetic generation in classical theories carries the risk of replacing the object with a non-socio-psychological one, shifting it to other areas of science (developmental psychology, psychogenetics, demography).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions.</b> The study identified the features of classical, non-classical, and post-non-classical theories of generations — operationalization of “generation”, regularities of generational change (linear, cyclical, chaotic), possible subject and methods of research. Intergroup research plans yield valid results with non-classical and post-non-classical interpretations of generation.</p>

References

Andreeva, G.M. (2012). Identity presentation in interaction context. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological Research, 5(26), 1–14. (In Russ.)

Assmann, A. (2017). Has the connection of times broken down? The Rise and Fall of the Temporal Regime of Modern. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ. (In Russ.)

Belanovskiy, S.A. (2023). Representativeness of Qualitative Surveys. Interaktsiya. Interv’yu. Interpretatsiya = Interaction. Interview. Interpretation, 15(1), 69–94. (In Russ.)

Bruner, J. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research, 54(2), 11–32.

Campbell, S.M., Twenge, J.M., Campbell, W.K. (2017). Fuzzy But Useful Constructs: Making Sense of the Differences Between Generations. Work, Aging and Retirement, 3(2), 130–139.

Condorcet, J. (2011). Historical picture of the human mind progress. Moscow: State Public Historical Library of Russia Publ. (In Russ.)

Coomes, M., DeBard, R. (2004). Serving the Millennial Generation. San Francisco: JosseyBass Publ.

Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publ.

El’konin, D.B. (1989). Selected works in psychology. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ. (In Russ.)

Hammack, Ph.L. (2008). Narrative and the cultural psychology of identity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 222–247.

Geraklit Efesskii, (Heraclitus). (1983). Fragments of an essay later known as “Muses” or “On Nature”. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literature Publ. (In Russ.)

Howe, N., Strauss, W. (1997). The Fourth Turning: An American Prophecy — What the Cycles of History Tell Us About America’s Next Rendezvous with Destiny. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publ.

Howe, N., Strauss, W. (2007). The Next 20 Years: How Customer and Workforce Attitudes Will Evolve. Harvard Business Review, 85(7–8), 47−52.

Huzeeva, G.R. (2017). Inter-generational interaction of elderly and young people: specifics of communication and image of old age. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological Studies, 10(51), 1–14. (In Russ.)

Kornilova, T.V., Smirnov, S.D. (2022). Methodological foundations of psychology. Moscow: Yurait Publ. (In Russ.)

Kryukova, T.L. (2008). Young people about elder generation: the psychology of intergenerational conflict (gap). Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological Studies, 2(2), 1–11. (In Russ.)

Levada, Yu.A. (2001). Generations of the 20th century: research opportunities. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny = Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (5), 7–14. (In Russ.)

Leont’ev, A.N. (1999). Evolution of the psyche. Moscow: Moscow Psychological-Social Institute Publ. (In Russ.)

Lisovskii, V.T. (1996). Sociology of youth. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Press. (In Russ.)

Maksimova, O.A. (2015). Entelechy of Russian society generations. Trudy SPbGIK = Proceedings of SPGIK, (205), 32–37. (In Russ.)

Mannheim, K. (1952). The Problem of Generations. In: P. Kecskemeti, (ed.). Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. (pp. 276-320). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Publ.

Marcuse, H. (1994). One-Dimensional Man. Studies in ideology of advanced industrial society. Moscow: REFL-book Publ. (In Russ.)

Markert, J. (2004). Demographics of Age: Generational and Cohort Confusion. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 26(2), 11–25.

Martsinkovskaya, T.D., Poleva, N.S (2017). Generations of the transitivity era: values, identity, communication. Mir psikhologii = World of Psychology, (1), 24–37. (In Russ.)

Martsinkovskaya, T.D., Turusheva, Yu.B. (2017). Narrative as methodology, investigating the personality in transitive word. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological Studies, 10(52), 2–13. (In Russ.)

McCrindle, M. (2018). The ABC of XYZ: understanding the global generations. Sydney: McCrindle Research Publ.

Mead, M. (1988). Culture and world of childhood. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

Melnikova, O.T., Khoroshilov, D.A. (2013a). Methodological principles of qualitative research in psychology. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya = Lomonosov Psychology Journal, (3), 4–17. (In Russ.)

Melnikova, O.T., Khoroshilov, D.A. (2013b). Subject of qualitative research as a methodological problem of social psychology. National Psychological Journal, (1), 50–61. (In Russ.)

Melnikova, O.T., Tychinina, M.I. (2022), Models of romantic relationships and narrative identity of female representatives of generations X, Y, Z. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya “Psikhologiya. Pedagogika. Obrazovanie” = RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Psychology. Pedagogics. Education” Series, (2), 47–69. (In Russ.)

Ortega y Gasset, J. (1991). Philosophy of culture. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ. (In Russ.)

Petrovskii, A.V. (2006). Psychology and time. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ. (In Russ.)

Radaev, V.V. (2020). The Millennial Generation Split: Historical and Empirical Rationale. (Part 1). Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal = Sociological journal, 26(3), 30−63. (In Russ.)

Rikel, А.M., Dorokhov, Ye.A. (2023). Analysing generation in social psychology: research or reject? Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 46(3), 143–165. (In Russ.)

Rikel, А.M., Tychinina, М.I. (2017). Generational differences in interpersonal relationships strategies. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological Studies, 10(51), 9–21. (In Russ.)

Romney, A.K., Batchelder, W., Weller, S.C. (1987). Recent Applications of Culture Consensus Theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 31(2), 163–177.

Rozhdestvenskaya, E.Yu. (2012). Biographical method in sociology. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publ. (In Russ.)

Saporovskaya, M.V. (2010). Methodology, theory and practice of studying intergenerational relation in family context. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological Studies, 1(9), 1–14. (In Russ.)

Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907.

Semenova, V.V. (2001). Differentiation and consolidation of generations in a transforming society. In: V.A. Yadov, (ed.). Russia transforming society. (pp. 256–271). Moscow: KANONpress-Ts Publ. (In Russ.)

Semenova, V.V. (2003). Modern conceptual and empirical approaches to the concept of “generation”. In: L.M. Drobizheva, (ed.). Reforming Russia: Yearbook. (pp. 213–237). Moscow: Institute of Sociology of the RAS Publ. (In Russ.)

Simmel, G. (2019). Selected: Philosophy of Culture. Moscow: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ Publ. (In Russ.)

Sivrikova, N.V. (2015). Problems of studying generations in psychology. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 11(2), 100–107. (In Russ.)

Soldatova, G.U., Rasskazova, E.I., Nestik, T.A. (2017). Digital generation of Russia: competence and safety. Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russ.)

Stepin, V.S. (2013). Types of scientific rationality and the synergetic picture of the world. Slozhnost’. Razum. Postneklassika = Complexity. Mind. Postnonclassic, (4), 45−59. (In Russ.)

Tkhostov, A.Sh, Rikel, A.M., Vialkova, M.Ye. (2022). Fake News through the Eyes of Three Generations of Russians: Differences and Similarities in Social Representations. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 15(1), 83–102.

Twenge, J.M., Campbell, W.K., Freeman, E.C. (2012). Generational Differences in Young Adults’ Life Goals, Concern for Others, and Civic Orientation, 1966–2009. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 1045–1062.

Twenge, J.M. (2006). Generation Me: Why Today’s Young Americans Are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled and More Miserable Than Ever Before. New York: Free Press.

Twenge, J. (2019). iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy–and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood. Moscow: RIPOL klassik Publ. (In Russ.)

Vygotsky, L.S. (2005). Psychology of human development. Moscow: Smysl Publ; Eksmo Publ. (In Russ.)