Theoretical and Experimental Psychology
ISSN 2073-0861
eISSN 2782-5396
En Ru
ISSN 2073-0861
eISSN 2782-5396
Articles

Body schema and the system of mental representation of human movements

Abstract

Background. TThe study of mental representations of the human body has more than a century history. Although quite a lot of knowledge and research results have already been accumulated, there is still no common understanding of the body schema and body image. Despite the importance of the internal representation system for the formation and implementation of body movements, in the Russian-language literature very few works are devoted to this issue.

Objective. The study had its purpose to systematize and analyze data on the body schema and body image as systems of internal representation of human movements.

Results. The literature analysis showed that most researchers agree that body schema and body image are different non-identical phenomena and that body schema, or at least its parts, is innate. In the course of life, body schema plays a crucial role in the implementation of body movements, including through feedback, integration of sensorimotor experience and multimodal sensations. At the same time, the body image cannot be considered in isolation from the body schema. It is formed mainly on the basis of integration of various types of stimulation (tactile, vestibular, proprioceptive, visual, etc.). In the context of studying movement formation, proprioception and vestibular reception also play a critical role. Thus, in case of the proprioception loss, the body image suffers first of all, which leads to impossibility of automatic performance of even simple movements. However, there is still a possibility to realize the motor function on the basis of the body schema.

Conclusions. Body schema, being initially innate, is a relatively independent phenomenon, which is gradually adjusted, refined and perfected in the course of life, growth, and accumulation of individual experience (motor, sensory, vestibular, proprioceptive, etc.). Body image is predominantly formed during one’s life on the basis of integration of information from proprioception, multimodal receptors, sensorimotor stimulation, and feedback.

References

Abramson, H.A., Jarvik, M.E., Gorin, M.H., Hirsch, M.W. (1956). Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD-25): XVII. Tolerance Development and its Relationship to a Theory of Psychosis. The Journal of Psychology, 41(1), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1956.9916206

Aday, J.S., Wood, J.R., Bloesch, E.K., Davoli, C.C. (2021). Psychedelic drugs and perception: A narrative review of the first era of research. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 32(5), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2020-0094

Akopov, G.V. (2023). New approaches to formulation and solution of the problem of consciousness. Natsional’nyy psikhologocheskiy zhurnal (National psychological journal), 1(49), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2023.0106

Aleksandrov, Yu.I. (Ed). (1997). Fundamentals of Psychophysiology. Moscow: INFRAM. (In Russ.).

Anderson, E.W., Rawnsley, K. (1954). Clinical Studies of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide. European Neurology, 128(1–2), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1159/000139775

Apelian, C., De Vignemont, F., Terhune, D.B. (2023). Comparative effects of hypnotic suggestion and imagery instruction on bodily awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 108, 103473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2023.103473

Baier, B., Karnath, H.-O. (2008). Tight Link Between Our Sense of Limb Ownership and Self-Awareness of Actions. Stroke, 39(2), 486–488. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.495606

Barber, T.X. (1971). Imagery and “hallucinations”: effects of lsd contrasted with the effects of “hypnotic” suggestions. Imagery, 101–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-635450-8.50012-1

Berger, C.C., Lin, B., Lenggenhager, B., Lanier, J., Gonzalez-Franco, M. (2022). Follow Your Nose: Extended Arm Reach After Pinocchio Illusion in Virtual Reality. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, (3), 712375. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.712375

Beskova, D.A. (2006). Clinico-psychological characteristics of external and internal boundaries of corporeality: On the model of somatoform disorders. Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Moscow. (In Russ.).

Binkofski, F., Buccino, G., Stephan, K.M., Rizzolatti, G., Seitz, R.J., Freund, H.J. (1999). A parieto-premotor network for object manipulation: evidence from neuroimaging. Experimental Brain Research, 128(1), 210–213.

Blanke, O. (2012). Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(8), 556–571. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3292

Blanke, O., Slater, M., Serino, A. (2015). Behavioral, Neural, and Computational Principles of Bodily Self-Consciousness. Neuron, 88(1), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.029

Bonnier, P. (1905). L’Aschématie [Aschematia]. Revue Neurologique (Paris), 13, 605–609.

Botvinick, M., Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature, 391(6669), 756–756. https://doi.org/10.1038/35784

Bourgeois, J., Farnè, A., Coello, Y. (2014). Costs and benefits of tool-use on the perception of reachable space. Acta Psychologica, (148), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.008

Bourgeois, J., Farnè, A., Coello, Y. (2014). Costs and benefits of tool-use on the perception of reachable space. Acta Psychologica, (148), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.008

Cardinali, L., Frassinetti, F., Brozzoli, C., Urquizar, C., Roy, A.C., Farnè, A. (2009). Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema. Current Biology, 19(13), 1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.048

Coslett, H.B. (1998). Evidence for a Disturbance of the Body Schema in Neglect. Brain and Cognition, 37(3), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1998.1011

Critchley, M. (1950). The body-image in neurology. The Lancet, 255(6600), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(50)90101-2

D’Angelo, M., di Pellegrino, G., Seriani, S., Gallina, P., Frassinetti, F. (2018). The sense of agency shapes body schema and peripersonal space. Scientific Reports, (8), 13847. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32238-z

de Vignemont, F. (2010). Body schema and body image—Pros and cons. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 669–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.022

Doidzh, N. (2022). The plasticity of the brain. Amazing facts about how thoughts can change the structure and function of our brains. Moscow: Litres. (In Russ.).

Ehrsson, H.H., Spence, C., Passingham, R.E. (2004). That’s My Hand! Activity in Premotor Cortex Reflects Feeling of Ownership of a Limb. Science, 305(5685), 875–877. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097011

Eveloff, H.H. (1968). The LSD Syndrome—A Review. California medicine, 109(5), 368.

Fotopoulou, A., Jenkinson, P.M., Tsakiris, M., Haggard, P., Rudd, A., Kopelman, M.D. (2011). Mirror-view reverses somatoparaphrenia: Dissociation between first- and third-person perspectives on body ownership. Neuropsychologia, 49(14), 3946–3955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.10.011

Gallagher, S., Cole, J. (1995). Body schema and body image in a deafferented subject. Journal of mind and behavior, 16(4), 369–390.

Gerstmann, J. (1942). Problem of imperception of disease and of impaired body territories with organic lesions: relation to body scheme and its disorders. Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 48(6), 890–913. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurpsyc.1942.02290120042003

Guttmann, E. (1936). Artificial Psychoses Produced by Mescaline. Journal of Mental Science, 82(338), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.82.338.203

Haggard, P., Wolpert, D.M. (2005). Disorders of body scheme. In: In Freund, HJ, Jeannerod, M., Hallett, M., Leiguarda R., (Eds.). Oxford: Higher-Order Motor Disorders.

Halligan, P.W., Marshall, J.C., Wade, D.T. (1995). Unilateral Somatoparaphrenia After Right Hemisphere Stroke: A Case Description. Cortex, 31(1), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80115-3

Head, H., Holmes, H.G. (1911–1912). Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain, (34), 102–254.

Kilteni, K., Maselli, A., Kording, K.P., Slater, M. (2015). Over my fake body: Body ownership illusions for studying the multisensory basis of own-body perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, (9) , 141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00141

Kokorina, V.A., Gordeeva, O.V. (2010). Short-term sensory deprivation as a method of studying the actualgenesis of altered states of consciousness. Experimental Psychology in Russia: Traditions and Prospects (November 18-19), 2010). Мoscow: Publishing house MSUPE. (In Russ.).

Lackner, J.R. (1988). Some proprioceptive influences on the perceptual representation of body shape and orientation. Brain, 111(2), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/111.2.281

Leonov, S.V., Kruchinina, A.P., Bugrii, G.S., Bulaeva, N.I., Polikanova, I.S. (2022). Basic characteristics of postural balance of the stance of professional ice hockey players and beginners. National Psychological Journal, 2(46), 65–78.

Levik, Yu.S. (2012). Neurobiology of the Internal Body Representation System: Introduction to the Problem and Applications. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya (Modern Foreign Psychology), 1(2), 97–110. (In Russ.).

Liebert, R.S. (1957). Studies in the Effects of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD-25): Visual Perception of Verticality in Schizophrenic and Normal Adults. A.M.A. Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 77(2), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurpsyc.1957.02330320091012

Medina, J., Coslett, H.B. (2010). From maps to form to space: Touch and the body schema. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 645–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.017

Meltzoff, A.N. (1990). Towards a developmental cognitive science. Annals New York Acad. Sei., (608), 1–37.

Meshkova, T.A. (2021). The concept of a positive body image in modern foreign psychology. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya (Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology),10(2), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2021100206 (In Russ.).

Paillard, J. (1999). Motor control, today and tomorrow. In: G.N. Gantchev, S. Mori, J. Massion (Eds.), Body schema and body image: A double dissociation in deafferented patients (pp. 197–214).

Pitron, V., de Vignemont, F. (2017). Beyond differences between the body schema and the body image: Insights from body hallucinations. Consciousness and Cognition, (53), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.06.006

Polikanova, I.S., Leonov, S.V., Semenov, Yu.I., Yakushina, A.A., Klimenko, V.A. (2021). Psychological and psychophysiological mechanisms of motor skill training. Sibirskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal (Siberian Psychological Journal), (82), 54–81. (In Russ.).

Ramachandran, V. (1998). The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain, 121(9), 1603–1630. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.9.1603

Ramachandran, V.S., Blakeslee, S. (2019). Phantoms of the brain. Moscow: AST Publishing.

Romanov, R.V. (2022). Experience of Distress Associated with Body Image and Gender Identity. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, (3), 225–252. https://doi.org/10.11621/vsp.2022.03.11

Rueschemeyer, S.-A., Pfeiffer, C., Bekkering, H. (2010). Body schematics: On the role of the body schema in embodied lexical-semantic representations. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 774–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.019

Rupchev, G.E. (2001). Psychological structure of internal bodily experience in somatisation (on the model of somatoform disorders). Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Moscow. (In Russ.).

Saks, O. (2017). The man who mistook his wife for his hat. Moscow: AST Publishing.

Schilder, P. (1999). The image and appearance of the human body. New York: Barnes & Noble.

Serino, A., Alsmith, A., Costantini, M., Mandrigin, A., Tajadura-Jimenez, A., Lopez, C. (2013). Bodily ownership and self-location: Components of bodily self-consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(4), 1239–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.08.013

Slater, M., Pérez Marcos, D., Ehrsson, H., Sanchez-Vives, M.V. (2008). Towards a digital body: the virtual arm illusion. Frontiers in human neuroscience, (2), 181. https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.006.2008

Tataurova, S.S. (2009). Actual problems of body image research. Psihologicheskij vestnik Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Psychological Bulletin of the Ural State University), (8), 142–154. URL: https://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/4066/3/pv-13-08.pdf

Tkhostov, A. (2022). Psychology of corporeality. Moscow: Litres.

Tsakiris, M. (2010). My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 703–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.034

Tsakiris, M., Haggard, P. (2005). The Rubber Hand Illusion Revisited: Visuotactile Integration and Self-Attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.80

Vallar, G., Ronchi, R. (2009). Somatoparaphrenia: A body delusion. A review of the neuropsychological literature. Experimental Brain Research, 192(3), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1562-y

Varlamov, A.V., Yakovleva, N.V. (2022). Distortions of Body Perception during Immersion in Computer Virtual Reality Using Full-Body Tracking. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 19(4), 670-688. doi: 10.22363/2313-1683-2022-19-4-670-688 (in Russ.).

Velichkovskii, B.M., Zinchenko, V.P., Luriya, A.R. (1973). Psychology of Perception. Moscow: Moscow Univ. Press. (In Russ.).

Vogeley, K., Fink, G.R. (2003). Neural correlates of the first-person-perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(1), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00003-7

PDF, ru

Received: 09/14/2023

Accepted: 10/03/2023

Accepted date: 02/07/2024

Keywords: body schema; body image; mental representations; internal representation system

  • To cite this article:
Issue 1, 2024