Understanding the Past and Counterfactual Possibilistic Thinking
Abstract
Background. The article substantiates that today the research emphasis of many psychologists is shifting from understanding the present to analyzing the psychology of understanding the past and the future. Understanding the past is analyzed as a general humanitarian and psychological problem. Counterfactual thinking is considered as a psychological mechanism for understanding the past.
Objectives. To analyze the understanding of the past as a function of counterfactual possibilistic thinking.
Results. The study delivered an analysis of the role of counterfactual thinking in understanding the past, which did not actually happen, but could include alternative possible events. Counterfactual thinking was considered not as Laplace’s consistent description of the human world, but as a complex ambiguous mental formation. It is shown that counterfactual reasoning is a tool of cognition not only for psychologists, but also for historians, linguists, political scientists and researchers in other specialties. The presented analysis allowed to identify and describe five functions of counterfactual possibilistic thinking, manifested in behavior and activity: cognitive, meaningforming, motivational, moral, and affective-regulatory.
Conclusions. The psychological basis of retrospective counterfactual thinking is an appeal to the past, an analysis of the possible but not accomplished options for the development of the events and situations under study. A characteristic feature of the counterfactuals is that counterfactual events are not just something that did not happen, but something that could actually replace what happened.
References
Albright, C.L. (2017). Harnessing Students’ Competitive Spirit: Using Reacting to the Past to Structure the Introductory Greek Culture Class. The Classical Journal, 112(3), 364–379.
Arutyunova, K.R., Alexandrov, Y.I. (2019). Morality and subjective experience. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences Publ. (In Russ.)
Attali, J. (2014). A Brief History of the Future. Saint Petersburg: Peter Publ. (In Russ.)
Beck, S.R., Robinson, E.J., Carroll, D.J., Apperly, I.A. (2006). Children’s Thinking About Counterfactuals and Future Hypotheticals as Possibilities. Child Development, 77(2), 413–426.
Beghetto, R.A. (2023). A new horizon for possibility thinking: A conceptual case study of Human & AI collaboration. Possibility Studies & Society, 1(3), 324–341.
Byrne, R.M.J. (2017). Counterfactual thinking: From logic to morality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(4), 314–322.
Domanska, Je. (2011). Performative turn in modern humanitarian knowledge. In: M.A. Kukarceva, (ed). Ways of comprehending the past: Methodology and theory of historical science. (pp. 226–235). Moscow: Kanon+ ROOI Publ., Reabilitacija Publ. (In Russ.)
Druzhinin, A.S., Lavrova, N.A. (2024). What is irreal about the past and why past is about irreality: A cognitive perspective on preteritirrealis cross-linguistic relationship. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya = Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, (87), 23–54. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/87/2
Ekshtut, S.A. (2001). “Unfulfilled — make it come true!” Experience of historiosophical understanding of the subjunctive mood in history. Rossiya i Sovremennyj Mir = Russia and The Contemporary World, (1), 134–156. (In Russ.)
Epstude, K., Effron, D.A., Roese, N.J. (2022). Polarized imagination: partisanship influences the direction and consequences of counterfactual thinking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 377(1866). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0342
Epstude, K., Roese, N.J. (2008). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(2), 168–192.
Fitzgibbon, L., Murayama, K. (2022). Counterfactual curiosity: motivated thinking about what might have been. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 377(1866). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0340
Gautam, S., Owen Hall, R., Suddendorf, T., Redshaw, J. (2023). Counterfactual choices and moral judgments in children. Child Development, 94(5), 296–307.
Girotto, V., Ferrante, D., Pighin, S., Gonzalez, M. (2007). Postdecisional counterfactual thinking by actors and readers. Psychological Science, 18(6), 510–515.
Glăveanu, V.P. (2018). The Possible as a Field of Inquiry. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(3), 519–530.
Karpenko, A.S. (2017). Counterfactual Thinking. Logicheskie issledovanija = Logical Investigations, 23(2), 98–122. (In Russ.)
Krom, M.M. (2023). The Enigma of Causality: What Makes Historians to Seek for the Causes of the Main Events and What Prevents Them from Determining the Causes Definitely? Novoe Proshloe = The New Past, (4), 106–124.
Nekhamkin, V.A. (2011). Counterfactual historical studies. Istoricheskya Psihologia i Sociologia Istorii = Historical Psychology & Sociology, 4(1), 102–120.
Plungian, V.A. (2004). Counterfactual uses of pluperfect. In: Yu.A. Lander, V.A. Plungian, A.Yu. Urmanchieva, (eds.). Studies in the Theory of Grammar: Irrealis and Irreality. (pp. 273–291). Moscow: Gnosis Publ. (In Russ.)
Pushkin, A.S. (1950). About the second volume of “History of the Russian People” N.A. Field. Moscow: State Publishing House of Fiction. (In Russ.)
Röse, N. (2012). Counterfactual thinking. In: V.F. Spiridonova, M.V. Falikman, (eds.). Horizons of cognitive psychology: a reader. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Cultures Publ., Russian State Humanitarian University (RGGU) Publ. (In Russ.)
Zinchenko, V.P., Meshcheryakov, B.G. (eds.). (1997). Psychological Dictionary. Moscow: Pedagogika-Press Publ. (In Russ.)
Znakov, V.V. (2023a). Understanding the past and future. Voprosy Psychologii = Psychology Questions, 69(4), 3–15. (In Russ.)
Znakov, V.V. (2023b). Psychology of the possible and possibilistic thinking. Teoreticheskaya i Eksperimental’naya Psikhologiya = Theoretical and Experimental Psychology, 16(2), 5–22. (In Russ.)
Received: 05/20/2024
Revised: 06/27/2024
Accepted: 08/11/2024
Keywords: understanding the past; counterfactual reasoning; functions of counterfactual thinking; alternative events
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11621/TEP-24-22
Available in the on-line version with: 17.09.2024
-
To cite this article:
