Transformation of Students’ Personality Characteristics in the Context of Digitalization

Abstract

Background. In the context of rapid digitalization of the educational environment, a transformation of cognitive processes is observed, accompanied by a change in the nature of metacognitive regulation of educational activity. The problem of metacognitive decline syndrome, manifested in a weakening of the ability for self-reflection, planning and control of cognitive strategies, is of particular relevance. This phenomenon can be a key factor in university maladjustment, expressed in a decrease in academic performance, an increase in psychoemotional stress and cognitive overload in students.

Objective. To identify and analyze the dynamics of students' personality characteristics for the period 2014–2024, to reveal the impact of digitalization on the students' metacognition, regulatoryity, and communicativeness, and establish its connection with maladjustment in the educational environment. Based on the data obtained, propose "digital detox" strategies as a way to correct the identified negative trends.

Study Participants. The study involved 1148 respondents aged 18 to 22 years (Mage = 19.8; SD = 1.2). The sample included two time cohorts: 582 undergraduate students (2014), 566 undergraduate students (2024).

Methods. The study was based on a survey design using the 16PF-questionnaire by R.B. Cattell in an adapted Russian-language version. To process quantitative data, the method of psychological profiles and structural psychological analysis were used.

Results. A comparative analysis of students' personality profiles for 2014 and 2024 revealed increasing discordance and disorganization of the personality structure, which is manifested in a decrease in adaptive abilities and degradation of metacognitive functions. In the cognitive sphere, fragmentation of thought processes and weakening of correlations between cognitive factors were found, which indicates the formation of a superficial, situationally-oriented style of thinking. Structural analysis of personality showed looseness and fragmentation of connections between adaptively significant qualities, which reduces the integrity of the personality and its resources, and also confirms the need to develop "digital detox" programs and restore regulatory functions.

Conclusions. The results of the study confirm significant negative changes in the psychological structure of students' personalities during the period of digital transformation, including a decrease in adaptive abilities, fragmentation of thinking, and disintegration of self-regulation. The data obtained substantiate the need to implement psychological and pedagogical programs aimed at developing metacognitive skills, conscious digital behavior, and restoring cognitive-regulatory functions.

References

Andreeva, A.D., Lisichkina, A.G., Morosanova, V.I. (2024). Conscious self-regulation and readiness for self-realization in adolescence. Theoretical and Experimental Psychology, 17(4), 165–181. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/TEP-24-38

Baumeister, R.F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., Tice, D.M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252

Bermus, A.G. (2025). Transformation of higher education in Russia from the position of world-system analysis: current trends. Lomonosov Pedagogical Education Journal, 23(1), 102–120. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.55959/LPEJ-25-05

Carr, N. (2020). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. New York: W.W. Norton and Company Publ.

Elhai, J.D., Dvorak, R.D., Levine, J.C., Hall, B.J. (2017). Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology. Journal of Affective Disorders, 207, 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.030

Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Hobfoll, S.E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513

Kapustina, A.N. (2006). Multifactorial personality technique of R. Cattell. St. Petersburg: Rech' Publ. (In Russ.)

Karpov, A.V. (2004). Metasystemic organization of level structures of the psyche. Moscow: IP RAS Publ. (In Russ.)

Karpov, A.V. (2022). Structural explication of the method of psychological profiles. Yaroslavskii psikhologicheskii vestnik = Yaroslavl Psychological Bulletin, (3), 7–22. (In Russ.)

Karpov, A.V., Karpov, A.A. (2022). The structure of metacognitive regulation of information activity. Moscow: RAE Publ. (In Russ.)

Karpov, A.V., Karpov, A.A., Filippova, Yu.V. (2022). The specifics of the relationship between the processes of meta-thinking and meta-memory. Eksperimental'naya psikhologiya = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 15(4), 50–67. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2022150403

Lazarus, R.S., Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Publ.

Lomov, B.F. (1984). Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

Mark, G., Gudith, D., Klocke, U. (2008). The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress. In the CHI'08. In: M. Burnett, M.F. Costabile, T. Catarci, B. de Ruyter, D. Tan, M. Czerwinski, A. Lund, (eds.). Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (April 5–10, 2008). (pp. 107–110). New York: Association for Computing Machinery Publ. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357072

Meshkova, N.V., Bochkova, M.N., Kravtsov, O.E. (2024). Malevolent creativity and personal features of young people in different socio-political conditions: relationship and interaction. Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 47(1), 88–105. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/LPJ-24-04

Mrazek, M.D., Franklin, M.S., Phillips, D.T., Baird, B., Schooler, J.W. (2021). Mindfulness training improves working memory capacity and GRE performance while reducing mind wandering. Psychological Science, 24(5), 776–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612459659

Norman, E., Pfuhl, G., Sæle, R.G., Svartdal, F., Låg, T., Dahl, T.I. (2019). Metacognition in psychology. Review of General Psychology, 23(4), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268019883821

Rossolimo, G.I. (1914). Psychological profiles of handicapped students (in relation to age, gender, degree of retardation, etc.). Moscow: Typo-lithography of the I.N. Kushnerev and Co. partnership. (In Russ.)

Sirois, F.M., Pychyl, T.A. (2013). Procrastination and the priority of short-term mood regulation: Consequences for future self. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12011

Small, G., Vorgan, G. (2008). iBrain: surviving the technological alteration of the modern mind. New York: Harper Collins Publ.

Spitzer, M. (2018). Digital dementia: what we and our children are doing to our minds. Stuttgart: Droemer Knaur Publ.

Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: the power of talk in a digital age. New York: Penguin Books Publ.

Twenge, J.M. (2017). iGen: why today's super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy and completely unprepared for adulthood. New York: Atria Publ. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12345

Wolf, M. (2018). Reader, come home: the reading brain in a digital world. New York: Harper Publ.

Zinchenko, V.P. (2010). Consciousness and the creative act. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Cultures Publ. (In Russ.)