Individual Differences in Planning in Children who Survived Pediatric Cancer and Healthy Control

Abstract

Pediatric cancer poses an increased risk of cognitive deficits: the planning function may decrease. As a result, in children who survived cancer, the planning function is reduced in comparison with the control group. Medical factors did not act as predictors of planning development; age and gender were significant predictors.

References

1. 1. Litvinov DV, Karelin AF, Romanova KI, Rumyantseva YuV, Karachunskiy AI. Lecheniye ostrogo limfoblastnogo leykoza u detey: sovremennyye vozmozhnosti i nereshennyye problemy. Doctor.ru 2015; 10(111):30–37. eLIBRARY ID: 23860020 (in Russian).
2. Khachatryan VA, Ulitin AYu, Kumirova EV, Zheludkova OG, Rumyantsev AG, Kim AV, ... Pal'tsev AA. Medulloblastoma (obzor literatury) Chast' 2. Kompleksnoye lecheniye. Neyrokhirurgiya i nevrologiya detskogo vozrasta 2014; 2(40):68–80 (in Russian).
3. Anderson VA, Anderson P, Northam E, Jacobs R, & Catroppa C. Development of executive functions through late childhood and adolescence in an Australian sample. Developmental Neuropsychology 2001; 20(1):385–406.
4. Benzing V, Spitzhuettl J, Siegwart V, Schmid J, Grotzer M, Heinks T, ... & Everts R. Effects of cognitive training and exergaming in pediatric cancer survivors – a randomized clinical trial. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2020; 52(11):2293–2302.
5. Blair C, & Razza RP. Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development 2007; 78(2):647–663.
6. Boman KK, Lindblad F, & Hjern A. Long‐term outcomes of childhood cancer survivors in Sweden: a population‐based study of education, employment, and income. Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society 2010; 116(5):1385–1391.
7. Cheung YT, & Krull KR. Neurocognitive outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on contemporary treatment protocols: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2015; 53:108–120.
8. Deng X, & Lv T. Power system planning with increasing variable renewable energy: A review of optimization models. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019; 246:118962. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118962.
9. Grissmer D, Grimm KJ, Aiyer SM, Murrah WM, & Steele JS. Fine motor skills and early comprehension of the world: two new school readiness indicators. Developmental Psychology 2010; 46(5):1008–1017.
10. Kalliopi K, Parissis JT, Ovidiu C, & Dimitrios F. Cardiogenic shock in cancer. Heart Failure Reviews 2019; 24(6):997–1004.
11. Karlson CW, Albert NM, Liu W, Brinkman TM, Annett RD, Mulrooney DA, ... & Krull KR. Longitudinal pain and pain interference in long‐term survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Cancer 2020; 126(12):2915–2923.
12. Lawson GM, & Farah MJ. Executive function as a mediator between SES and academic achievement throughout childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development 2017; 41(1):94–104.
13. Locascio G, Mahone EM, Eason SH, & Cutting LE. Executive dysfunction among children with reading comprehension deficits. Journal of Learning Disabilities 2010; 43(5):441–454.
14. Owen AM. The functional organization of
    working memory processes within human lateral
    frontal cortex: the contribution of functional
    neuroimaging. European Journal of
    Neuroscience 1997; 9(7):1329–1339.